- Minor taken from children’s home and forced to sell her body
- Denied her original statement to avoid ‘trouble’
- Girl gave evidence from behind curtain to avoid gaze of accused
A 14-year-old girl was threatened at gun point and told she would be shot if she refused to have sex with men, the Old Bailey heard today.
She was one of six schoolgirls who were allegedly exploited by a child prostitution ring over eight years.
Girl B, now 21, told jurors that men would wait for her near the children’s home where she was living in 2006.
She would be driven to various places where she would be plied with drink and drugs in order to be raped or sold to other men.
She said Akhter Dogar threatened her when she refused to perform a sex act.
‘He said if I didn’t do what I was told he knew someone who would shoot me,’ she told jurors.
In August 2006, she was taken to a flat off Rectory Road, Oxford, and rang police after realising she was with 11 men, including two of the accused, who wanted to have sex with her.
‘They told me if they ask, to say I was 16,’ she said.
The girl was spoken to away from the men and admitted she was 14 and had run away from a children’s home.
The following day, she made a statement saying nothing happened and withdrew her complaint. Asked why, she told the court: ‘I was scared and I didn’t want any trouble.’
The girl gave evidence from behind a curtain so she could not see the accused. Nine men from Oxford deny 51 counts, including rape, trafficking and organising prostitution between 2004 and last year.
Child B was recruited by another 14-year-old girl, known as Child A, from the children’s home where they both lived.
The other girl, who was also allegedly abused by the gang, persuaded her to run away with her after claiming she had friends in Oxford who could get them alcohol and cigarettes.
Once there, she was introduced to the Dogars, along with Kamar Jamil, 27, and a fourth man known only as ‘Khan’, who is not on trial.
During one of her early visits, Jamil – known as ‘K-Dog’ – and Khan drove her and Child A to a remote field.
The sexualisation of children by the government, Dept of Education, ‘pregnancy advice centres’, social workers, school nurses, media aimed at teen girls, contraceptive industry lobbyists, fashion industry and the welfare state to name just a few, is a crime against humanity.
It is also gross hypocrisy for the police to prosecute paedophiles when the government is overseeing boy scouts being given condoms from the age 11 and girls of the same age being told it is OK to have sex if they use ‘protection’. Boys and girls at age 11 are not allowed to marry but they can have sex and produce children. Every parent is worried about his child being indoctrinated into the idea that gay and sexual promiscuity is “normal” modes of behaviour. At the same time, all parents have the right to control their children and it is their Duty to control them.
It is an eye opening for the Muslim parents who keep on sending their children to state schools with non-Muslim monolingual teachers. Bilingual Muslim children need state funded Muslim schools with bilingual Muslim teachers a s role models during their developmental periods. Muslim teachers are in a better position to teach sex education to teenagers according to Islamic perspectives. There is no place for a non-Muslim child or a teacher in a Muslim school. State funded Muslim schools are crucial for social cohesion, religious and cultural harmony. They are preparing children and young people to face the challenges of life in modern Britain and to also contribute in a positive way to wider society. Muslim children will develop self-confidence and self-esteem. According to TES, pupils make more progress at Muslim secondary schools than anyother type of schools. They are promoting tolerance and support the spiritual, moral, social, linguistic and cultural development of pupils.
IA
http://www.londonschoolofislamics.org.uk
re: Iftikhar;
While I agree with your contention relative to the sexualization of children by all of the entities you mentioned and more (as you already know) I do not see how this in any way condones the ‘all to common’ attacks on these little girls.
Even if a girl or woman were to run down the street completely naked, (as wrong as that would be) it does not give any uninvited man the right to touch her. The only way we are ever going to be able to put a halt to this abhorant crime wave being perpetrated on the young girls of almost every nation of the world is if we:
First, acknowledge that there is a problem.
Second, acknowledge who the agressors are.
Third, take swift and immediate action against the perpetrators through forced castration and severe imprisonment terms.
Additionally, I know your position on non-integrated / government funded / public funded schools for muslims.
Is this honestly relative to this article?
Blessed Salutations in Our One Creator, Brother Iftikhar.
His Servant and Soldier,