37 comments on “Facebook Assaults the Constitution: Removes Counterjihad and Patriot Pages Without Warning

      • How can pages which were informative like Ban Islam be taken down and pages promoting that people can kill and die for Mohammed be left on? Senseless totally beyond reason :(

        Like

      • re: Patricia O’Sullivan;

        You are exactly right.

        There are several ways to silence free speech. One method being, to directly make laws against it. That is a process that is currently underway in the UN through the efforts of the OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) via the “Istanbul Process.” (The Blasphemy Against Islam Laws.)

        Another method is to directly target those who provide a forum for free speech. (ie) Facebook.

        This is no surprise to me. I have been telling people for a while now that this is the way the government would go. Essentially, telling Facebook… “..we do not want any negative speech against Islam. Either remove the pages or your website will be fined heavily..”

        I do not know that this is what occurred in this case, but it is probably something like that. (or) This could be just Facebook acting on their own. There are many muslims in very high positions now at Facebook Corporate.

        Either way.. it is disgusting and utter hypocrisy.

        While “we” are not able to even “speak” negatively about Islam without the threat of legal retribution, muslims can behead Christians, burn their Churches down, honor kill their own women, rape and molest our daughters.. and that is perfectly fine. So long as “we” do not speak about it.

        We live in an evil, upside down world Patricia.

        s/m @ sharia unveiled

        Like

    • re: Don Lufc Gold;

      Thank you for providing this info. Don. Please keep record of all EDL divisions (and, any other sites) that are removed and let me know.

      Please notify Tommy and Kev (if you know them) and Leeds Edl div. that there will be a worldwide Class Action Lawsuit forming in the near future against Facebook. The more plaintiffs in the case, the stronger the case against Facebook.

      Keep in touch brother,

      EDL & ADL Forever.. NSE!

      s/m @ sharia unveiled

      Like

  1. Pingback: Facebook Assaults the Constitution: Removes Counterjihad and Patriot Pages Without Warning | Hussein Wazzen

    • re: Mr. Wazzen;

      Oh man…

      I just visited your website. That is a very nice looking site. You’ve got some great info on their. If you’d like, I’ll direct some traffic your way. I’ll also put you on our sites blogroll.

      What is your sites name? Is “Hussein Wazzen” the name of the site?

      Also, send me a link to your facebook page.

      Congratulations brother on being a murtadd !! You are the bravest among us. Many of my best friends are murtadd.

      Write me back here..okay.

      your brother,

      s/m @ sharia unveiled

      p.s. Everybody Check Out.. Hussein Wazzen at: http://husseinwazzen.wordpress.com/

      Like

    • re: rogerunited;

      That is an excellent idea.

      Would you have time to initiate that? If so, we can help you promote it and direct the people your way.

      That is definitely an avenue that must be pursued.

      s/m @ sharia unveiled

      Like

      • re: rogerunited;

        I got it partner. The plan sounds good. I didn’t release it for public viewing because of what you mentioned about “creating the account.”

        That’s “our” business.

        I went ahead and addressed the issue about the “Bounty” in my most recent post because I felt that was an immediate threat.

        s/m @ sharia unveiled

        Like

  2. First of all, I’m not backing Facebook, but they are a private corporation and censor what ever they want. The 1st Amendment restricts the government from censoring free speech, censoring the press, etc.

    Like

    • re: Richard;

      I am afraid your assessment is inaccurate. ” Traditionally, the press has always been in the hands of the public sector. The entire purpose of the First Amendment is the protection of right of the individual to possess his/her freedoms within the public arena. According to your assessment, the citizen should only retain the protections afforded by the right to freedom of speech on govenment owned websites, newspapers, etc. That is a ludicrous interpretation. Facebook operates primarily on revenue generated via advertising. The more traffic on their site directly means more money. Why do you think Wal Mart does NOT have employees standing at the door asking customers before entry.. “..what is your position on abortion..?” Because they do not care. What they care about is your dollar.. If they denied ALL people opposed to abortion, that would be a violation of the law. (Not to mention, losing the far majority of their customers.) Is Wal Mart not a private company? Yes.. but, you cannot violate the law. Facebook is now standing at the door asking people.. “What is your position on Islam?” This is a violation of the law and will be addressed accordingly. Furthermore, the government IS involved here in this case. Why would facebook make a decision that would lose revenue on their own? The fact is they wouldn’t. This is “Top-down” legislation that originates from the UN OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) via the Istanbul Process..which is the institution of the worldwide “Blasphemy Laws.” (Laws that prohibit any negative speech against Islam.)

      s/m @ sharia unveiled

      Like

  3. Pingback: The B&R Monday Skim | Black & Right

  4. Technically, the prohibitions against limiting those freedoms apply only to the govt., not to individuals and corp. entities. You have no Constitutional right to say or promote ANYTHING on their site they don’t want there. You CAN vote with your “feet,” however. Go ahead and raise holy hell, just don’t expect a judge to back your play.

    Like

    • re: dilligras;

      I am afraid your assessment is totally inaccurate. ” Traditionally, the press has always been in the hands of the public sector. The entire purpose of the First Amendment is the protection of right of the individual to possess his/her freedoms within the public arena. According to your assessment, the citizen should only retain the protections afforded by the right to freedom of speech on govenment owned websites, newspapers, etc. That is a ludicrous interpretation. Facebook operates primarily on revenue generated via advertising. The more traffic on their site directly means more money. Why do you think Wal Mart does NOT have employees standing at the door asking customers before entry.. “..what is your position on abortion..?” Because they do not care. What they care about is your dollar.. If they denied ALL people opposed to abortion, that would be a violation of the law. (Not to mention, losing the far majority of their customers.) Is Wal Mart not a private company? Yes.. but, you cannot violate the law. Facebook is now standing at the door asking people.. “What is your position on Islam?” This is a violation of the law and will be addressed accordingly. Furthermore, the government IS involved here in this case. Why would facebook make a decision that would lose revenue on their own? The fact is they wouldn’t. This is “Top-down” legislation that originates from the UN OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) via the Istanbul Process..which is the institution of the worldwide “Blasphemy Laws.” (Laws that prohibit any negative speech against Islam.)

      s/m @ sharia unveiled

      Like

  5. Pingback: Islamic Terrorist Organization Places Bounty on Infidel Webpage Administrators | sharia unveiled

  6. What a joke. There is no Constitution for Facebook. And, this site is anti-Christian, anti-religion, and anti-freedom. It’s false, full of lies, and made by hateful bigots.

    Like

  7. Pingback: News: COURAGE vs fear | Pitts Report

  8. Pingback: WHO’S NEXT? Islamic Terrorist Organization Places Bounty on Counter-jihad Website Administrators | American Infidels

  9. Pingback: Radical Muslims post bounty on bloggers, Facebook users | Most Intolerant Religion

  10. Pingback: Steynian 477nd | Free Canuckistan!

  11. I have a suggestion for Facebook! Remove yourself entirely from the internet allowing an honest American Constitution Company to come forth on the internet!
    I think you are a biased racist bunch of asssholes!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s